Skip to main content

Fix it for a cost.

A cynic is just a frustrated optimist. That was the fortune out of the fortune cookie. "How appropriate," they said. "You would be the one to get that." I stuffed it into my pocket because, really, it was an appropriate fortune. I don't even like fortune cookies. They don't taste good. The only reason I get them is to read the fortune. I couldn't care less about the disgusting shit it comes wrapped in.

Quite clearly, I remember reading a book wherein a character was described as cynical. That actually happened on multiple occasions. I never knew what being cynical entailed. Being so young, I couldn't decipher the dictionary definition. And my mother never had a solid way of explaining it to me. People who see the bad in everything, I think.

It's funny to see how cliques form between people as quickly as they do. Even in elementary school. Little group of best friends. Anthony and Luke and Joe and Jimmy. How they've all grown up. Jimmy used to be that little kid that played Jurassic Park with me. He used to be Ian Malcolm, I would be Alan Grant. Now he's a super liberal political enthusiast and I still wish I was Alan Grant. Luke and Joe used to love playing with action figures. Now they both have jobs. And Anthony used to be my best friend. See how well that turned out.

His sister really grew up, though. Anyways.

A boy transferred into our class. From Saudi Arabia. Tahsir. He was different. He was a different color, his lips were perpetually chapped, and his name was strange. And for that he was shunned. A class of little second grade shits echoing their quietly racist upbringings on the playground. We were young, then. Young and stupid and naive. "Why don't you go away." "Yeah, Trashir." We strung together insults as best we could, being seven years old at the time.

After enduring a verbal barrage one afternoon, he turned to me and waited. I didn't say anything, but something clicked in my mind. A realization that everything about everything that had happened was wrong. I looked back at the playground and soccer fields and basketball courts at all of the kids who found it easy to hate somebody without reason or remorse. And I gave up. I gave up trying to continue going along with them. I became friends with him. Good friends. But I was disappointed in myself and in everyone else. And I held it against them. I root for the underdog. I get angry when I see things that shouldn't be. Things that are wrong.

But lots of things are wrong. Lots of things will always be wrong.

I moved away a couple of years later. A new school full of new kids with new ideas to be inspired by and disappointed in. We tried being pen-pals for a while, after he moved back to Saudi Arabia. But I changed my e-mail address. We didn't even drift apart, we just stopped talking. I reconnected with him, recently. For what it's worth.

Playground pessimism, I guess. You never really outgrow your childhood.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You ended weak, but you started.

This is something I feel very strongly about. So strong are my emotions about it, in fact, that I have haphazardly drafted this singular post about it on the fly. I hope, for your sake, that you are seated as I deal with this incredibly important social issue and say controversial things--the likes of which give women the vapors. Shorts. I fucking hate shorts. I hate them because you can't look cool in them. Think about it. Have you ever seen an action hero save the world wearing shorts? No. Action heroes wear pants. Men wear pants. People who save the world wear pants. Pants, pants, pants. Nobody wears shorts excepts, like, stoners, lazy guys, and dudes. And bros. Those archetypes do not do adventurous things. Indiana Jones? Pants. Robocop? Pants. Flapjack? Pants. Bear Grylls? Pants. Australian stereotypes? Shorts. Australia really likes to try to censor their internet content. That doesn't sound so awesome and/or manly to me. To prove my conclusion that shorts a

Waiting and such.

A doctor came to speak at our lecture series the other day. Honestly, I don't even remember what kind of doctor he was. I don't remember any of the questions he answered. I don't remember any of the anecdotes he related. I don't remember any of the insight he imparted on us or any of the wisdom he shared. Except for one thing, which really resonated with me at the time. "The biggest challenge facing you as pre-health profession students," he said before the lecture ended. "Is the overwhelming cynicism of our society." He's right. He's right, and it's awful. I'm a pretty cynical guy, but at least I know it's a joke. That everything is a huge joke. But everybody is so jaded these days. We just can't stand to entertain the thought that maybe--just maybe--things aren't as bad as we think they are. As we want them to be. That maybe--just maybe--people aren't always selfish pieces of shit. There have been a lot

Pseudo-science (like psych).

I consider myself a man of science. I try to approach problems and deal with them logically, using observations previously recorded to handle new problems. So of course my interest was piqued when someone I knew posited that men are needier and more complicated than women. An interesting theory. But to properly examine it, one must understand the concept of sexual selection and its two aspects: male competition and female choice. Which brings us to point one: men are needier [in relationships] than women. This is true. In a natural/primal setting, the males are generally love-'em-leave-'em kinds of guys. Their main objective is to reproduce as much as they can. Humans, in their infinite wisdom, have decreased the emphasis on this to the point where it has become a footnote in male purpose. Civilization dictates that, instead of finding a partner for the sole purpose of reproduction, males find females for life companionship. With the effective removal of their natur