Skip to main content

And the doll house looks at me.

Every once in a while I start feeling like I want to explore religion again. It's a cyclic sort of mindset. Comes and goes like some sort of wave function. I think about doing it, but then I never really do. I always back out and return to my ambiguously spiritual mentality. I'm drawn to the guidance, I think. In the face of a lot of contrary sentiment, I have a lot of respect for religious people. That sort of thing takes a lot of inner strength and dedication. Having faith, I mean. Those people get a lot of flak for having a set code of morals and values that they--mostly--stick to, which is something I'll never be able to understand. I'm just too antsy about making philosophical decisions like that. Too obsessive about trying to find the balance in everything. I'm not religious or logical, I'm somewhere in the middle. I'm spiritual. Or, at least, I think I'm spiritual. Or, I want to think I'm spiritual.

Or, I think I want to think I'm spiritual. Who even knows?

Even though the conversation happened weeks ago, I'm still being haunted by something a friend told me. "One day," she said. "Somebody will be the last person in your group of friends left alive. And when they die, all of those memories and stories will disappear." It just keeps echoing in my head. It's not so much depressing as humbling. We just aren't that important in the long run, I guess. Which is probably why people like religious things. It gives them a purpose and a mission in life. A way to justify being alive, which is not something everybody can do.

And on a lighter note, my friends are getting married in the morning. It makes my head spin. I feel like I need to start living my life. I barely have any direction in the things I do. People are making plans and doing things and going places. I can look forward and see the timeline I've sketched and I can see that it's just not going to allow for the things that people are supposed to do in order to have fulfilling lives. I mean, yeah: I do want to get married and have a family. Eventually. But there is just no feasible way to fit that into my schedule for a long time. It's not even on my radar, really. It's way in the distance. But I can feel that clock ticking every once in a while.

It is the crocodile in my ocean, and I am the captain of a sinking boat.

Comments

Carolynn said…
I'm glad you remembered that. I've been thinking about it too. I'm glad you could relate to where I was coming from. It isn't a depressing thought--I guess I forget how big time is, until I think things like that.

I don't know if it would do anything for you, but I feel like it's my duty or something to offer to bring you along with me to mass sometime. If you ever wanna go. The UCC has an 8PM mass and the friendliest priest you could ever hope to encounter.

Popular posts from this blog

You ended weak, but you started.

This is something I feel very strongly about. So strong are my emotions about it, in fact, that I have haphazardly drafted this singular post about it on the fly. I hope, for your sake, that you are seated as I deal with this incredibly important social issue and say controversial things--the likes of which give women the vapors. Shorts. I fucking hate shorts. I hate them because you can't look cool in them. Think about it. Have you ever seen an action hero save the world wearing shorts? No. Action heroes wear pants. Men wear pants. People who save the world wear pants. Pants, pants, pants. Nobody wears shorts excepts, like, stoners, lazy guys, and dudes. And bros. Those archetypes do not do adventurous things. Indiana Jones? Pants. Robocop? Pants. Flapjack? Pants. Bear Grylls? Pants. Australian stereotypes? Shorts. Australia really likes to try to censor their internet content. That doesn't sound so awesome and/or manly to me. To prove my conclusion that shorts a

Pseudo-science (like psych).

I consider myself a man of science. I try to approach problems and deal with them logically, using observations previously recorded to handle new problems. So of course my interest was piqued when someone I knew posited that men are needier and more complicated than women. An interesting theory. But to properly examine it, one must understand the concept of sexual selection and its two aspects: male competition and female choice. Which brings us to point one: men are needier [in relationships] than women. This is true. In a natural/primal setting, the males are generally love-'em-leave-'em kinds of guys. Their main objective is to reproduce as much as they can. Humans, in their infinite wisdom, have decreased the emphasis on this to the point where it has become a footnote in male purpose. Civilization dictates that, instead of finding a partner for the sole purpose of reproduction, males find females for life companionship. With the effective removal of their natur

Waiting and such.

A doctor came to speak at our lecture series the other day. Honestly, I don't even remember what kind of doctor he was. I don't remember any of the questions he answered. I don't remember any of the anecdotes he related. I don't remember any of the insight he imparted on us or any of the wisdom he shared. Except for one thing, which really resonated with me at the time. "The biggest challenge facing you as pre-health profession students," he said before the lecture ended. "Is the overwhelming cynicism of our society." He's right. He's right, and it's awful. I'm a pretty cynical guy, but at least I know it's a joke. That everything is a huge joke. But everybody is so jaded these days. We just can't stand to entertain the thought that maybe--just maybe--things aren't as bad as we think they are. As we want them to be. That maybe--just maybe--people aren't always selfish pieces of shit. There have been a lot