Skip to main content

And you wonder why I'm so angry.

"There have been a lot of burglaries in the neighborhood lately," she said. My mom detailed out the series of recent robberies. "A couple days ago, a man woke up during the night when his garage door opened. Some burglars had broken into his car, opened the garage door, and came into the house. They started stealing electronics and stuff."

"What did he do?" I asked.

"He and his family hid in a bedroom upstairs and called the police. The burglars were gone by the time the sheriff arrived--it takes the police thirty minutes to respond. A few cars have been broken into for radios and things. Some people who run early in the mornings have reported seeing them breaking into the cars."

"What do they do?" I asked.

"I don't know if they call the police or not. There was a man who caught them breaking into his car one night."

"What did he do?" I asked.

"He came out with a gun and shot up in the air. It scared them off."

I didn't have to think very long to respond. It seemed like all of the stories ended the same way. "He shot in the air? Why didn't he shoot at them?" "He didn't want to kill them." "They were on his property, breaking and stealing his things. He should've shot them." "And incur huge court fees? Take out a third mortgage on his home to pay for lawyers? Over a $100 car stereo--is it worth it?" I could feel my blood boil.

"Of course it's worth it. It's the principle of it. Costs are irrelevant." I said. "What about the psychological cost?" She asked. "Of pulling the trigger on someone over a radio? I don't want to kill someone over a stupid car radio." "Then I'll do it." I replied. "That's a very impulsive thing to say." She said.

"I don't care. Our neighborhood has apparently been castrated. Those burglars aren't going to stop because they've haven't been caught. Because so far everybody has rolled over and let these thieves walk into their homes and take what they want. No punishment--no lesson. You want the burglaries to stop? Kill one of the burglars. That'll put a stop to it real quick." I said.

"If they threaten you in your home, then yes. But outside of your home? In your yard? Are you going to be able to pay for all of the court fees after you shoot them? The level head prevails." She said.

"That doesn't mean it's right." "Not everyone in our neighborhood is so wimpy. They get bolder because they don't get caught, but pretty soon they're going to walk into the wrong house. And then they'll get what they deserve." She said.

We have a responsibility to protect ourselves. It's something that a large number of people apparently doing understand, appreciate, or believe. They'd rather hide in a bedroom and cry for help while thieves rummage through their belongings downstairs. They'd rather flex their muscles and hope that the bad guys run away scared. They'd rather turn around and hope someone else deals with the problem. They'd rather wait for someone else to do anything. That's what we've been reduced to. It's the norm. We're taught to roll over and take what comes. The ones who are willing to fight back get punished and ostracized. That's how we reward true justice.

Justice comes at a high price, but you get what you pay for.

Comments

Ashley said…
You're ridiculous.

You really think that killing someone over theft is justice? A life is worth far more than belongings even if it's someone who obviously isn't an upstanding citizen.

And quite frankly, I would like to see you walk out there, not knowing if the person stealing from you was armed, and act like some kind of vigilante. You talk big, but I really think you'd be just like everyone else.

Real life isn't a comic book. Hate to break it to you.
Gabe said…
Yes, that is justice. You break the law, you get punished. That's how things should be. If people are too stupid to abide by written laws, then the least they can do is abide by laws of morality.

You're right: a person's life is worth much more than the junk people buy and not everyone is an upstanding citizen. That doesn't excuse them from stealing or doing mean things to other people.

If someone decides to break the law, gets caught, and gets hurt: fuck them.
If I run out thinking I'm Batman like an idiot and get hurt: fuck me. Maybe I'll go down like a bitch. At least I'll be the bitch who tried to do the right thing.

No, real life isn't a comic book. It's one of those romance novels nobody reads because it sucks so much.

Popular posts from this blog

You ended weak, but you started.

This is something I feel very strongly about. So strong are my emotions about it, in fact, that I have haphazardly drafted this singular post about it on the fly. I hope, for your sake, that you are seated as I deal with this incredibly important social issue and say controversial things--the likes of which give women the vapors. Shorts. I fucking hate shorts. I hate them because you can't look cool in them. Think about it. Have you ever seen an action hero save the world wearing shorts? No. Action heroes wear pants. Men wear pants. People who save the world wear pants. Pants, pants, pants. Nobody wears shorts excepts, like, stoners, lazy guys, and dudes. And bros. Those archetypes do not do adventurous things. Indiana Jones? Pants. Robocop? Pants. Flapjack? Pants. Bear Grylls? Pants. Australian stereotypes? Shorts. Australia really likes to try to censor their internet content. That doesn't sound so awesome and/or manly to me. To prove my conclusion that shorts a

Pseudo-science (like psych).

I consider myself a man of science. I try to approach problems and deal with them logically, using observations previously recorded to handle new problems. So of course my interest was piqued when someone I knew posited that men are needier and more complicated than women. An interesting theory. But to properly examine it, one must understand the concept of sexual selection and its two aspects: male competition and female choice. Which brings us to point one: men are needier [in relationships] than women. This is true. In a natural/primal setting, the males are generally love-'em-leave-'em kinds of guys. Their main objective is to reproduce as much as they can. Humans, in their infinite wisdom, have decreased the emphasis on this to the point where it has become a footnote in male purpose. Civilization dictates that, instead of finding a partner for the sole purpose of reproduction, males find females for life companionship. With the effective removal of their natur

Waiting and such.

A doctor came to speak at our lecture series the other day. Honestly, I don't even remember what kind of doctor he was. I don't remember any of the questions he answered. I don't remember any of the anecdotes he related. I don't remember any of the insight he imparted on us or any of the wisdom he shared. Except for one thing, which really resonated with me at the time. "The biggest challenge facing you as pre-health profession students," he said before the lecture ended. "Is the overwhelming cynicism of our society." He's right. He's right, and it's awful. I'm a pretty cynical guy, but at least I know it's a joke. That everything is a huge joke. But everybody is so jaded these days. We just can't stand to entertain the thought that maybe--just maybe--things aren't as bad as we think they are. As we want them to be. That maybe--just maybe--people aren't always selfish pieces of shit. There have been a lot