Skip to main content

It's like ray-hee-aiin.

As I rode my bike away from my class, the first thing that caught my eye was the enormous colored display of fetuses in various stages of development/abortion. As I got closer I could make out the details of the smaller pictures and, eventually, the text that accompanied the images.

Then I saw the other sign. "Warning: graphic images ahead."

The display blocked most of the street, forcing people to mill around beneath it. I came by after my classes were done to read what people had written on the signs marked "Free Speech Board." Most of the text detailed how disgusted the authors were by the pictures of aborted fetuses and mentioned how the images encouraged them to advocate abortion even more. I sat on my bike and read through both sides of the board, following the succession of thoughts indicated by the myriad of arrows.

I was about to leave when a girl near me decided she was fed up with what she had been reading. She huffed and puffed and grabbed a marker, scribbling madly across the white paper. When she finished her rant she stepped back and admired her handiwork. Then she started talking. She grabbed the closest ears and started hissing and growling about how only idiots could hold such an opinion as the one she read. She listed off why "their" beliefs were stupid and why hers were superior. She mentioned that they were stupid a few times, too. She went on and on until someone else--with the opposite view--jumped in.

They tangled and exchanged words and I stayed and listened until I had trouble keeping a straight face. I pushed off and rode slowly into the crowd. It reminded me of an episode of Home Movies. "Everybody's Entitled To My Opinion."Sometimes I wish people would keep their opinions to themselves. It certainly is nice that people have beliefs that they are willing to fight for, but there are certain rules and etiquette inherent to holding them. At least, I think there are.

There are forums where discussions can be held in an orderly manner. People just choose not to use them, I guess. They'd rather run outside and pick fights with everyone who sees the world differently from them. Maybe I'm the only one who thinks this way, but if people just kept their thoughts to themselves they wouldn't make stupid decisions or say stupid things when people--with the opposite view--got them upset. They wouldn't get into fights. They wouldn't look stupid in front of everyone with enough sense to shut up. We'd be a lot more civilized that way, I think.

But if we didn't voice our opinions, then we'd never advance ourselves. We'd just sit there and stagnate because nobody would be brave enough--or stupid enough--to say what they thought. And nobody would be brave enough--or stupid enough--to fight them on it. So we'll just keep going along as we are. Like squabbling idiots.

That's okay, I guess.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Like you said, you can never make advancements until someone challenges the norm.

But there are better ways to go about it.

Popular posts from this blog

Side effects include constant irritability, being an ass.

It was a typical day in MUS 307 . A typical day where nobody pays attention to anything the professor talks about. A day where people play shitty flash games instead of take notes. A day where people sit and refresh their Facebook newsfeed instead of follow the slides. A day where people roll their eyes and go to sleep instead of listen to the music examples. A day where people get up and leave ten minutes before lecture ends instead of having the God damn decency to stay the whole time and pretend to be interested. I mean, if you're going to be so unaffected by the music we're studying in class then why the fuck did you take the class in the first place? Fuck it makes me mad. And I haven't even started talking about that fucker who sits in the back and tries to whistle along with every song that gets played in class. Alright, dude, we get it: you are just too cool and you know everything about jazz, ever. You know every standard ever written and everybody's so...

So, I mean, there's that.

So I went to church again. I slept through most of it but I woke up to hear this: "Oh Lord you are holy indeed. You are a fountain of holiness." Dang, I thought. That is pretty holy. I saw The Nightmare Before Christmas again recently. That is still one of my favorite movies. I never get tired of watching it for some reason. I remember the first time I saw it quite clearly. I was about 5 years old at the time, I think. My dad and I were in the Albertson's video store looking for something to watch as was our Friday night custom. I walked through the aisle, glossing over the scary movies as quickly as I could without looking like I was scared. My dad pulled me aside with a video in hand. "What do you think about this one?" He held up a cover with a skeleton on the cover and 'nightmare' in the title. "It doesn't look very good." I said nonchalantly. "It looks lame." I rolled my eyes and turned away, playing it cool....

Pseudo-science (like psych).

I consider myself a man of science. I try to approach problems and deal with them logically, using observations previously recorded to handle new problems. So of course my interest was piqued when someone I knew posited that men are needier and more complicated than women. An interesting theory. But to properly examine it, one must understand the concept of sexual selection and its two aspects: male competition and female choice. Which brings us to point one: men are needier [in relationships] than women. This is true. In a natural/primal setting, the males are generally love-'em-leave-'em kinds of guys. Their main objective is to reproduce as much as they can. Humans, in their infinite wisdom, have decreased the emphasis on this to the point where it has become a footnote in male purpose. Civilization dictates that, instead of finding a partner for the sole purpose of reproduction, males find females for life companionship. With the effective removal of their natur...