Skip to main content

It's like ray-hee-aiin.

As I rode my bike away from my class, the first thing that caught my eye was the enormous colored display of fetuses in various stages of development/abortion. As I got closer I could make out the details of the smaller pictures and, eventually, the text that accompanied the images.

Then I saw the other sign. "Warning: graphic images ahead."

The display blocked most of the street, forcing people to mill around beneath it. I came by after my classes were done to read what people had written on the signs marked "Free Speech Board." Most of the text detailed how disgusted the authors were by the pictures of aborted fetuses and mentioned how the images encouraged them to advocate abortion even more. I sat on my bike and read through both sides of the board, following the succession of thoughts indicated by the myriad of arrows.

I was about to leave when a girl near me decided she was fed up with what she had been reading. She huffed and puffed and grabbed a marker, scribbling madly across the white paper. When she finished her rant she stepped back and admired her handiwork. Then she started talking. She grabbed the closest ears and started hissing and growling about how only idiots could hold such an opinion as the one she read. She listed off why "their" beliefs were stupid and why hers were superior. She mentioned that they were stupid a few times, too. She went on and on until someone else--with the opposite view--jumped in.

They tangled and exchanged words and I stayed and listened until I had trouble keeping a straight face. I pushed off and rode slowly into the crowd. It reminded me of an episode of Home Movies. "Everybody's Entitled To My Opinion."Sometimes I wish people would keep their opinions to themselves. It certainly is nice that people have beliefs that they are willing to fight for, but there are certain rules and etiquette inherent to holding them. At least, I think there are.

There are forums where discussions can be held in an orderly manner. People just choose not to use them, I guess. They'd rather run outside and pick fights with everyone who sees the world differently from them. Maybe I'm the only one who thinks this way, but if people just kept their thoughts to themselves they wouldn't make stupid decisions or say stupid things when people--with the opposite view--got them upset. They wouldn't get into fights. They wouldn't look stupid in front of everyone with enough sense to shut up. We'd be a lot more civilized that way, I think.

But if we didn't voice our opinions, then we'd never advance ourselves. We'd just sit there and stagnate because nobody would be brave enough--or stupid enough--to say what they thought. And nobody would be brave enough--or stupid enough--to fight them on it. So we'll just keep going along as we are. Like squabbling idiots.

That's okay, I guess.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Like you said, you can never make advancements until someone challenges the norm.

But there are better ways to go about it.

Popular posts from this blog

You ended weak, but you started.

This is something I feel very strongly about. So strong are my emotions about it, in fact, that I have haphazardly drafted this singular post about it on the fly. I hope, for your sake, that you are seated as I deal with this incredibly important social issue and say controversial things--the likes of which give women the vapors. Shorts. I fucking hate shorts. I hate them because you can't look cool in them. Think about it. Have you ever seen an action hero save the world wearing shorts? No. Action heroes wear pants. Men wear pants. People who save the world wear pants. Pants, pants, pants. Nobody wears shorts excepts, like, stoners, lazy guys, and dudes. And bros. Those archetypes do not do adventurous things. Indiana Jones? Pants. Robocop? Pants. Flapjack? Pants. Bear Grylls? Pants. Australian stereotypes? Shorts. Australia really likes to try to censor their internet content. That doesn't sound so awesome and/or manly to me. To prove my conclusion that shorts a

Pseudo-science (like psych).

I consider myself a man of science. I try to approach problems and deal with them logically, using observations previously recorded to handle new problems. So of course my interest was piqued when someone I knew posited that men are needier and more complicated than women. An interesting theory. But to properly examine it, one must understand the concept of sexual selection and its two aspects: male competition and female choice. Which brings us to point one: men are needier [in relationships] than women. This is true. In a natural/primal setting, the males are generally love-'em-leave-'em kinds of guys. Their main objective is to reproduce as much as they can. Humans, in their infinite wisdom, have decreased the emphasis on this to the point where it has become a footnote in male purpose. Civilization dictates that, instead of finding a partner for the sole purpose of reproduction, males find females for life companionship. With the effective removal of their natur

Waiting and such.

A doctor came to speak at our lecture series the other day. Honestly, I don't even remember what kind of doctor he was. I don't remember any of the questions he answered. I don't remember any of the anecdotes he related. I don't remember any of the insight he imparted on us or any of the wisdom he shared. Except for one thing, which really resonated with me at the time. "The biggest challenge facing you as pre-health profession students," he said before the lecture ended. "Is the overwhelming cynicism of our society." He's right. He's right, and it's awful. I'm a pretty cynical guy, but at least I know it's a joke. That everything is a huge joke. But everybody is so jaded these days. We just can't stand to entertain the thought that maybe--just maybe--things aren't as bad as we think they are. As we want them to be. That maybe--just maybe--people aren't always selfish pieces of shit. There have been a lot